Dell recommends Windows 8.

Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD

Pablo Valerio, International Business & IT Consultant | 2/4/2013 | 24 comments

Pablo Valerio
Just a few years ago, if someone asked me about the best business smartphone, the answer was clear: BlackBerry. In Europe, many people would have chosen Nokia as the best business device.

Those phones were welcome in the enterprise, and many corporations issued them as their standard phones for executives. Those phones and their robust operating systems were designed to offer the highest level of security for accessing corporate networks via VPNs and to integrate flawlessly with Exchange and other secure corporate email. The disadvantage of RIM and Nokia at that time was that their phones were just work phones. Now workers are begging IT departments to let them bring their new toys to work and use them in the corporate networks -- the infamous BYOD.

After ignoring the enterprise for the consumer market, the main smartphone manufacturers (Apple, Samsung, HTC, Nokia, and LG) and the main mobile OS vendors (Google, Apple, and Microsoft) are beginning to see the need for enterprise-strong mobile devices that restore the confidence of IT departments.

With more than 250 million iPhones and 100 million iPads sold, Apple is trying to convince the corporate world that its devices are safe for the enterprise (or can be). Last year, it launched iPhone in Business and iPad in Business sections on its website. The sections are focused on security, compliance, and easy deployment of iOS devices in the enterprise. Mobile device management (MDM) servers can configure wirelessly, update settings, monitor compliance with corporate policies, and even wipe or lock managed iOS devices.

Android manufacturers are following suit. Samsung has developed its Samsung For Enterprise (SAFE) program. It is creating special versions of its phones and tablets for corporate customers, as well as special versions of the Android OS for corporations requiring improved security. The SAFE program has four pillars: Corporate Email/Calendar/Contacts, On-Device Encryption, Virtual Private Network, and Mobile Device Management. It allows IT not only to wipe or lock a missing device, but also to disable standard smartphone features such as WiFi, cameras, microphones, and data roaming, ensuring the device can be used only for authorized activities in the workplace.

Of course, Microsoft, with its new flagship Windows 8 and Windows RT, can be seen as the best bet for mobile devices in the enterprise. Though it initially said Windows RT was "primarily designed for consumer devices," it has been busy getting the System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SP1 ready to accommodate the growing number of Windows RT and Windows 8 phones. Windows RT and Windows 8 phones are equipped with enterprise-level applications such as Microsoft Office and Exchange, and integrating them with other applications takes minimal work. Furthermore, the configuration manager handles access and certification for iOS and Android devices in the enterprise.

OEMs like Dell have already introduced Windows 8 tablets specifically designed for the enterprise. The Latitude 10 tablet features a full implementation of Windows 8 with a removable battery -- something critical for busy executives on the road. This is not a typical consumer tablet, but a full-featured business tablet targeted toward corporate, healthcare, and education professionals. And its security is uncompromised. Windows 8 Pro devices can be domain joined and managed traditionally via Group Policy -- something impossible for Windows RT, iOS, or Android devices.

Despite demands from employees, most organizations are much better off limiting the use of mobile devices to one platform. Managing and certifying more than one OS can be a recipe for disaster, and most IT organizations do not have the resources to monitor potential threats in different ecosystems. Also, companies should consider the possibility of limiting devices to one model of smartphone and tablet. That can increase hardware costs, but the potential savings in support and security can easily compensate for that.

To me, the BYOD trend is no more than a bad experiment with extremely expensive consequences for most enterprises. The ones that realized the danger and established clear policies and limits have been able to contain the damage, but the proliferation of devices and apps makes security more complicated every day. Using new tools and devices specifically designed to protect your networks is paramount in keeping your data safe.

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Randomus   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/23/2013 12:01:17 PM
Re: Standards for BYOD are the way forward
Sohaibmasood:  The idea of 'standards' in the corporate BYOD craze seems like an oxymoron, even if talking about a common standard.  It's a really confusing mess for IT teams and businesses, with employees stuck somewhere in the middle. 
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/18/2013 7:40:03 AM
Re: Standards for BYOD are the way forward
Toby, I agree with you. Either people would have to upgrade or say goodbye to devices that cannot be upgraded. It would help in gearing up towards the goal of a common standard. 
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/18/2013 7:38:23 AM
Re: BYOD experiment
Not really, non tech savvy people can also learn to use new gadgets. It is just a matter of time & the effort you put in to learn. 
Toby   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/18/2013 6:40:18 AM
Re: Standards for BYOD are the way forward
@sohaibmasood : Yes it might kill some devcies but that is the point. Those that don't comply need to go or be upgraded. You as what would drive the standards? Simple buying pressure. If enterprise users create them and insist on product compliance the market will respond.
anthony.nima   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/17/2013 1:23:29 AM
Re: BYOD experiment
Yes true shoaib. that is why gadgets are more suited to technically savy guys. I think we should change this.
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/17/2013 12:24:22 AM
Re: BYOD experiment
Yeah, the adoption curve kind of depends on your tech skills. If you are accustomed to tech gadgets you should get the hang of things quite quickly. However, I agree with you on the enterprise level that minutes wasted in trying to figure out gadgets could be utilized elsewhere. 
Randomus   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/16/2013 1:31:52 PM
Re: BYOD experiment
So true.  The learning curve between my RIM BlackBerry and Samsung G S3 wasn't extremely steep – but if I were in the workplace, where time is money, then I would have wasted quite a bit of time just tinkering around.  Enterprise BYOD is such a fascinating topic because it's such a complex matter, though it is extremely easy to mess up.
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/16/2013 9:45:29 AM
Re: Standards for BYOD are the way forward
Toby, if the standardization actually takes place at the vendor level wouldn't it kill some of the devices out there? Secondly, what would bring enterprises together and collaborate on a single BYOD policy?
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/16/2013 9:43:24 AM
Re: Standards for BYOD are the way forward
Toby, that would be ideal, wouldn't it? In reality I think it would be much more difficult to bring everyone on the same platform. 
sohaibmasood   Enterprise-Ready Mobile Devices an Alternative to BYOD   2/16/2013 9:41:25 AM
Re: BYOD experiment
I think BYOD started because users wanted to bring the devices they were comfortable with at work. IMO, the pace at which users adopt to technology (especially hardware) is better than enterprises. 

I mean I was a software developer and had a p4 laptop at work which was bombarded with apps. At home I had a C2D which performed significantly better than the work laptop. So, some days I used to bring it to work for efficient usage. 
Page 1 / 3   >   >>


The blogs and comments posted on EnterpriseEfficiency.com do not reflect the views of TechWeb, EnterpriseEfficiency.com, or its sponsors. EnterpriseEfficiency.com, TechWeb, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.

More Blogs from Pablo Valerio
Pablo Valerio   3/19/2013   31 comments
"To respond to online security breaches in real-time conditions, a well-functioning network of Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERT) should be established in Europe." This is one of ...
Pablo Valerio   10/10/2012   30 comments
Last month, Foxconn, the largest Chinese private manufacturer, was forced to close their Taiyuan factory after police had to be called to stop a riot involving some of their 79,000 ...
Pablo Valerio   9/12/2012   37 comments
Some companies might believe they are above the law. Some companies have been able to sneak around the law, because of regulators who were weak and lax at enforcing the rules -- the ...
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
Dell Information Resources
SPONSORED BY DELL
VIDEOS
WINDOWS CLIENT
WINDOWS SERVER
© 2014 UBM TechWeb - Privacy Policy